on the way to Enlightenment
What we hosers hope will get resolved
Published on November 6, 2004 By sunwukong In International
There are a few bright, burning issues of contention that exist between the good neighbours in North America. Hopefully these will get resolved amicably during GW Bush's second term:

1. Lumber tariffs -- though the Canadian stumpage rules do need reform, the tariff regime imposed by the US is way out of line since they can't even prove to their own FTC that anyone has been substantively harmed. This has been going on for over a decade now (almost two) and every multinational dispute panel has sided with the Canada. At stake are several thousand jobs lost, billions drained from the economy, and seized funds in the billions.

2. Beef -- despite all scientific evidence and reasoning, the USA refuses to open its borders to Canadian beef. Over a billion dollars has been lost to the Canadian economy (mostly the province of Alberta, which happens to be the most USA friendly of all). There was a theory that Kerry would have preserved the closure and that Bush is actively working on ending it. Let's see what happens.

3. Intellectual Property -- currently, Canada has far more protections, both legislatively and in common law (i.e., court rulings) for the protection of consumers rights with respect to intellectual property fair use. Provided we don't sell or actively distribute content we have purchased in one medium, we are free to copy it to other mediums for our own use. This is being actively fought by the current, dominant players in the "old media" on both sides of the border.

4. Missile Defense -- besides being ridiculed from both a scientific and military (and financial) point of view, Canada is being pressured to assist the development of active missile defense. Opposition sees this as a scientific boondogle with a serious chance of turning into a fiscal black hole -- a very sensitive issue since Canadian military spending is so proportionally low. However, the current minority government is showing signs of caving in just to ease US-Canada relations.

5. Gay Marriage -- this is pretty much a done deal in Canada. Our courts and (most) legislatures are on their way to allowing homosexuals the same rights under marriage (and divorce) as hetero couples. A large majority of the population in all regions supports this effort. A huge cultural gap between the two countries.

6. Decriminalization of Pot -- mixed feelings about this throughout the Canadian population and various levels of law enforcement. Currently the balance is in favour of so-called "weak decriminilization" of small amounts. Law enforcement on both sides of the border aren't so pleased.

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Nov 07, 2004
It doesn't necessarily... but it would make getting a lot of other things over the border a bit more difficult....


Which still does not answer the reasoning behind stopping any pursuit into the Missile defense system, the missile defense system is designed to stop ICBM nukes, great let's stop just the suitcase nukes when the big ones rain down, better to pursuit defense on both than defense on one or none.

All or none Plinko!!
on Nov 07, 2004
This statement implicates the inevitable rise & fall of world powers.

Something I believe we have a real possibility of witnessing w/rt to the USA in our lifetimes.

Will political & social issues affect this propsoition; should such considerations factor in to Canada’s expected convenience in shopping at Chinamart?

Good or bad, both of our populations and, more importantly, governments and corporations are willing to do as much business with China as they can to their benefit. Entrepeneurial communists make for good (though not great or reliable) business partners.

Are you really sure Canada's healthcare system is all that you pretend?

There's not much use in swapping worst case anecdotes -- they don't:
- result in improvements in either or our systems, or
- allow us more freedom to access better health care personally

What I'm much more interested in discussing are what kind of things you're seeing locally that does result in better service/outcomes. Most health jurisdictions are experimenting to both save money and improve services.
on Nov 07, 2004
Which still does not answer the reasoning behind stopping any pursuit into the Missile defense system

From a Canadian perspective, the cold hearted reasoning is pure risk analysis -- what's the probability of one our cities to be targeted versus the probability of a portable event (e.g., suitcase bomb) being snuck in to either target us or to cross the border?

Spending x amount can either count relatively insignificantly against missile defense research (with the risk it goes nowhere) or it can significantly reduce the chances of a portable event affecting either country via Canada.
on Nov 07, 2004
Spending x amount can either count relatively insignificantly against missile defense research (with the risk it goes nowhere) or it can significantly reduce the chances of a portable event affecting either country via Canada.


And then there is the whole MAD thing... I mean, no matter how crazy N. Korea's leaders are.... they would have to realize that a nuclear strike against the United States using a missile attack would result in the utter destruction of their entire country.
2 Pages1 2